Review Form 1. Title of Proposed Event -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please summarize: the topic of the workshop; its key strengths and contributions to RSS; and any primary weaknesses or concerns: 2. How important is this topic to the robotics community? ------------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite important [] not so much [] unimportant 3. How interesting will this workshop be to RSS participants? ------------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite interesting [] not so much [] uninteresting Any comments regarding relevance or interest: 4. What is the status of the workshop website? ---------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor Any comments regarding the submitted web page: 5. Is the suggested duration of the workshop appropriate? --------------------------------------------------------- [] Yes [] No, too long [] No, too short 6. Do the organizers have a good plan for soliciting participation? ----------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor Any comments regarding the plan for soliciting participation: 7. Have the organizers proposed a format that will encourage discussion and interactions during their proposed event? ----------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor Any comments regarding the expected interactivity of the proposed event: 8. Are there an appropriate number of speakers/participants involved? Are they relevant to the scope of the project? ---------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor Any comments regarding the submitted list of speakers: 9. Have the organizers outlined how they might encourage speakers to focus on the topic and tailor their talks to the workshop? ----------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor Any comments regarding the organizer’s plan to encourage focus on the workshop topic? 10. Have the organizers outlined how they will ensure diversity in ideas and participation? ----------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor Please explain: 11. If outlier track: how well does the proposal push the boundaries of traditional academic workshops by examining ideas that are (i) important for the field; (ii) poorly treated by the formal peer-review process? ----------------------------------------------------------- [] excellent [] quite good [] not so good [] poor [] not outlier track Please provide a statement regarding how and how well the proposal pushes the boundaries of traditional academic workshops: 12. Main Strength/Weakness of Workshop Proposal ---------------------------------------------- +: -: Please provide feedback to the organizers on how they could improve their event and its impact: 13. Overall Recommendation -------------------------- [] Strong accept [] Weak accept [] Weak reject [] Strong reject